🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.