🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an celebration that was initiated as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass functions where Black people are remunerated to address predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Month

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in winter, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Germany, Éire and the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since those days, focusing less on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and increasingly on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the way the month is celebrated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how critical it is to rethink Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we saw the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a member of parliament gains confidence to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the America, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, often successfully, to the highest courts of the nation. A effort to scrub Black history and narrative from the archives is ongoing. One of the former president's first executive orders aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the observance represents how minimally it can be influential if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the realities of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. An academic expert, a professor at University of Greenwich, put it best when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a urge to just discontinue things like Black History Month completely, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an period that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an framework that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) included in educational programs. It would also be a time that does not shy away from political issues, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is basic knowledge of the past when it ignores the current situation of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Institutions who celebrate it should not be reassured with the passive language of implicit prejudice and alertness to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the dangers that impact society if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and adaptive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.